Feature Idea Portal

Open Demographics Field on Candidate Experience

It would be great if within OutMatch Assessment, we could send a survey invitation to participants and a rating survey to managers and the system could provide statistics on completion of those matches.  Additionally, if we wanted to do an open link, it would be great if we could have an option where employees entire a unique identifier (e.g. employee ID) and the system knows whether or not to allow them in and correctly matches them to their rater.

Another idea from Rachel & Courtney :)

  • Rachel Aguilera
  • Jul 27 2017
  • Plan to Build
Proposed Solution to the Problem
Clients/Prospects Who've Reported the Issue (If applicable)
  • Attach files
  • Ruthie Stoner commented
    March 01, 2018 23:11

    Unique ID is a separate request from validation automation. The ID is an urgent need - we are currently matching by name which is very time consuming and opens up opportunities for missed and incorrect matches.

  • Michael Zerda commented
    March 01, 2018 23:21

    Unique ID is paramount for the Talent Analytics team to accurately match assessment data to supervisor ratings/metrics during a validation study. Leaving it out opens us up to either 1) having a reduced sample size (remove people with the same name) and/or 2) having inaccurate matches between the two files.

  • Andrew McGrory commented
    March 02, 2018 14:00

    Not having a Unique ID for each case can make the merging process easily troublesome for research and validations. If we are able to get an ID, time will be saved and sample sizes will increase since we currently remove cases if names are exact. 

  • Bridget Bouse commented
    March 02, 2018 17:18

    Unique ID!! The OutMatch platform is a huge win particularly b/c it is more efficient and lowers our time to delivery; matching by name is not a scalable process and reduces efficiency during the validation

  • Laura Jamison commented
    March 02, 2018 19:04

    Not having a unique ID to match cases creates huge problems with validity particularly in ROI, and Turnover analyses. It reduces the level of return we're able to show our clients, and significantly reduces our confidence (and ultimately what we're able to report out on) in the data. 

  • Admin
    Andrew D'Agostino commented
    March 09, 2018 17:49

    Thanks for all of the comments and input here everyone! We'll be considering this as a high priority need for scalability purposes.